Whether or not the functions possess matrimonial assets of course sure, whether or not the petitioner try eligible to a share regarding matrimonial assets?
The initial parcel (EXHP8) that is located at Nyakihanga are bought by the petitioner out of a single Bataringaya, EXHP9 is the agreement to the almost every other parcel which is actually a gift from a single Bakasharebwa and you can Kirabo toward respondent and you can already have good banana plantation
A try was created in order to explain the expression ‘matrimonial property’ from the Women Justice Esther Kisakye regarding Rwabinumi Vs.